The Influence of Questionnaires

[Dullde 62]

Do you aware that just asking a project team questions on a telegram group might reveal what they have planned for their projects? Even if they have a scam plan, you may bombard them with questions. The first red sign you should watch for is the team attempting to avoid answering certain questions; if they are genuine, all questions should be addressed emphatically.

[BiomeBlackCanary 23]

When you're questioning the teams or administrators involved, it's probably appropriate to know what's going on with the project. It's critical to understand their intentions and the road map in order to assess their legitimacy and commitment to the project.

It doesn't imply they can't rug tug, however, since you can easily prepare replies to frequent inquiries or something.

[SmartestWitches 11]

Not entirely; I mean, a lot of these project owners and managers are pretty smart people, and they'll be expecting your questions and must have prepared for them ahead of time, making it relatively easy for them to provide answers to a slew of them; project owners who have trouble answering questions are the ones who didn't do their homework properly.

Having said that, the issue isn't so much whether or not the team responds to your questions; as you may be aware, many of these projects are simply about making numerous false promises; rather, you should be concerned about the use case: what exactly is the project about, does it have any utility, how long can it be useful, if it ever will be, and so on; this is the type of research that is required; if you rely on just asking them questions, I am pretty sure the problem will persist

[Libr2 40]

When you're questioning the teams or administrators involved, it's probably appropriate to know what's going on with the project. It's critical to understand their intentions and the road map in order to assess their legitimacy and commitment to the project.

It doesn't imply they can't rug tug, however, since you can easily prepare replies to frequent inquiries or something.

[TheEnd 28]

Questionnaires aren't the best location to ask them in Telegram groups. Even genuine initiatives may use obnoxious sensitive bots to regulate the group, which may lead to your expulsion.
Investigate the materials they offer on your own, and then create surveys in places where you or the team won't be able to censor them.

[BrainyWitherSkeleton 2]

Not entirely; I mean, a lot of these project owners and managers are pretty smart people, and they'll be expecting your questions and must have prepared for them ahead of time, making it relatively easy for them to provide answers to a slew of them; project owners who have trouble answering questions are the ones who didn't do their homework properly.

Having said that, the issue isn't so much whether or not the team responds to your questions; as you may be aware, many of these projects are simply about making numerous false promises; rather, you should be concerned about the use case: what exactly is the project about, does it have any utility, how long can it be useful, if it ever will be, and so on; this is the type of research that is required; if you rely on just asking them questions, I am pretty sure the problem will persist

[GamerRedstone 55]

To ask excellent questions, you need knowledge and experience, both of which are lacking in newcomers. Newbies are the most susceptible to scams, thus scam initiatives target them. They lack the expertise to recognize danger, so when they invest in their first crypto enterprise, all they see is a bright future with plenty of profit.

If you raise questions and obtain polished responses, this does not imply that the project is excellent. Scammers are often quite good at answering your inquiries, instilling optimism in you, and making their idea go viral. However, the quality of a project is not only determined by their responses. You get to view and test their actual items.

[derlderman 38]

It is difficult to recognize a scamming platform since, before they consider or agree to engage in scamming, they have conducted study to learn what people want, what they lack, and so on.

According to my knowledge, the best course of action is to avoid any online company that does not include crypto, as well as anybody who asks you to provide your front and back debit and credit card numbers, as well as your personal information.

[kimonode 14]

All of them had their own Telegram channel during the ICO craze, and they often answered queries posed by prospective investors. The great majority of queries were about projected profits, expected Exchanges to be listed on, and perhaps some concerns about the future, but few would go into the project's technical territory (due no to being able to converse at this level).

Some people, particularly those who are incisive and have a strong grasp of ideas and technology, may have been rescued from falling for a scam or a poor enterprise by asking questions, but the great majority will unhappily develop easy inquiries that will demand simple non-challenging responses.

[demonicde 13]

Then I'm guessing you've been around the crypto space for a while, because newbies won't know what questions to ask the team, and new project teams don't have time to answer questions on Telegram, so they hire moderators to manage their telegram accounts.

[enunciatede 40]

Newbies are generally the target demographic, but owing to a lack of awareness, even more seasoned members might fall prey to scams.
The blockchain technology has been connected to everything from health to online search engines, and investors often lack the necessary expertise in this field to correctly answer key concerns such as;

• Is there any real-world use for Blockchain in this field?
• Is there a platform that performs better than this one?
• Do you know of any other initiatives that are comparable to this one?

In my opinion, individuals should only invest in things about which they are knowledgeable. Keep it basic and steer clear of the utopian ideas that abound on many project road plans.